Most developed countries spend a large proportion of their health budgets on expensive medical technology and procedures. This money should be spent instead on health education to keep people well. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, most developed countries allocate the bulk of their coffers for high-priced healthcare equipment and treatments. While this has some clear inevitable advantages, I believe this money should be diverted into health education in order to prevent citizens from ailments and diseases.
It is understandable why many developed nations invest more of their budget in medical technology and operation. Firstly, advanced medical technology this practice will ensure more accurate and effective diagnosis as well as treatments. As a result, patients could save time and money because of appropriate therapies they receive. Secondly, modern medical technology plays an integral part in research of new diseases. For example, without the advancement of medical science, humans could hardly have discovered new virus and bacteria which are the root cause of many highly infectious diseases.
However, I am convinced that government should put greater emphasis on health education as it is much more valuable and essential for a healthier nationals. Once people have enough knowledge and information about healthcare, they would be nudged towards more healthier lifestyle choices, such as switching from processed food to organic ingredients. Moreover, some negative habits, say, abusing alcohol or smoking which could lead to serious illnesses relating to blood pressure and vital organs, can be reduced eliminated. In addition to improving overall health quality, campaigns that raise public awareness about healthcare and health problems could protect most vulnerable population. As medical fees have been inexorably increasing in recent years, low-income people may find it hard to impossibly afford prescription and treatment charges. Therefore, if they are aware of the ways to keep themselves healthy robust, they can decrease the chance decrease chance of having to go to the going to hospital for treatment.
In conclusion, while there are benefits of spending more budgets on medical technology and procedures, I opine that major investment should be provided for health education.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-08-30 | nahhan | 56 | view |
2021-07-03 | Gurjinder kaur 01 | 56 | view |
2020-11-18 | code6127 | 93 | view |
2015-10-26 | manikn10 | 75 | view |
2014-07-16 | drjowelynt | 63 | view |
- Most developed countries spend a large proportion of their health budgets on expensive medical technology and procedures This money should be spent instead on health education to keep people well To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
- Some people feel that young people should follow the traditions of their society Others think that they should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 89
- Fewer students are studying science at school and university favoring more computer based subjects instead Is this a positive or negative development What are the reasons for this 94
- The maps below show the changes in a town after a construction of a hydroelectric power dam 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
...ealthcare, they would be nudged towards more healthier lifestyle choices, such as switching fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ressure and vital organs, can be reduced eliminated. In addition to improving ov...
^^
Line 5, column 973, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n decrease the chance decrease chance of having to go to the going to hospital fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73717948718 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86135924446 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647435897436 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4839049628 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.857142857 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260133394062 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837359861608 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598120497596 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168187116703 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413173142622 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.