We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female education rather than admit men into its programs. It is true that a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation, arguing that it would encourage more students to apply to Grove. But 80 percent of the students responding to a survey conducted by the student government wanted the school to remain all female, and over half of the alumnae who answered a separate survey also opposed coeducation. Keeping the college all female will improve morale among students and convince alumnae to keep supporting the college financially."
The author suggests that the Grove College's programs should not enroll male students rather continue its traditional all-female education in order to improve morale among students and to get financial aid consistently from its alumnae. The author comes to this conclusion based on responses of faculty members and alumnae, which is potentially valid. However, the recommendation made by the author relies on three unwarranted assumptions that hinder its credibility.
First of all, the author is assuming that the responses from alumnae is more important than the faculty member's response. Perhaps the efficiency of running college programs may be hindered when the voice of majority of faculty members is not taken into account. In addition, it is possible that the there would be discrepancies among the staffs for not admitting male students to the college. If this cases are true, the argument does not hold water.
However, the author assumes the admitting only female students in the college make morale among the students, this might not be the case. There are still 20 percent of the students that they still favor for coeducation. There is also diversion among the responses of alumnae in response for coeducation- still 50 percentage of alumnae also wants coeducation. These cases may bring feeling of diversion rather than bringing morale among the students.
Finally, the author assumes that college will gain continuous financial support from the alumnae on admitting female students only. But it may be possible that that the alumnae would not support continuously to college in financial matters. In addition, it is possible that there might be other financial sources generated for the college in bringing coeducation system as increased enrollment of male students. If these cases are true, the credibility of the argument is seriously weakened.
In nutshell, the author primarily should provide above mentioned evidences to buttress his recommendation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | searchinglife06 | 55 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | searchinglife06 | 50 | view |
- We recommend that Grove College preserve its century old tradition of all female education rather than admit men into its programs It is true that a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation arguing that it would encourage more students to 57
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7 000 years ago and within 3 000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species extinctions becau 30
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework whereas in the district of Marlee most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no mo 73
- Claim The emergence of the online blogosphere has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States Reason When anyone can publish political opinions easily standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decl 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 307 350
No. of Characters: 1634 1500
No. of Different Words: 142 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.186 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.322 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.726 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 128 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 107 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 73 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.188 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.79 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.812 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.358 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.591 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.083 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...e students only. But it may be possible that that the alumnae would not support continuou...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, still, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 11.1786427146 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 307.0 441.139720559 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47231270358 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80303711188 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 204.123752495 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482084690554 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 705.55239521 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7908104184 57.8364921388 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 119.503703932 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 5.70786347227 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263973938883 0.218282227539 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810251580739 0.0743258471296 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651246084299 0.0701772020484 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135663439406 0.128457276422 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931141945491 0.0628817314937 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.3550499002 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.5979740519 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 98.500998004 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.