A role model is a person who is looked to by others as an example to be imitated, especially by younger people. Is youngsters taking up successful sport stars and glamorous film star as there role model is actually good or bad for them has been a controversial topic. I entirely oppose this notion and I will explain why in the following paragraphs.
There are a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that, along with good moral roles film stars sometimes also engage in roles that are immoral. These films will attract youngsters and sometimes one take up these roles in to real life. For example, many of the youngsters take up drugs and alcohols because of watching their role model do it in movies.
Another pivotal aspect of my argument is that successful sport stars often lose their temper in the field and might engage in fight. One youngster who is watching this will take up these into their field and this will result in the soar of dispute among students. Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars often lead a luxurious life without looking at consequences. This behavior is also easily attracted by youngsters.
In view of the arguments mentioned above, one can conclude the negative effects of taking up successful sports stars and glamorous film stars as role model by youngsters. In my opinion, one should take their parents as a role model in life.
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy Is it blessing or curse 55
- Education is the biggest barrier in my learning Einstein What do you mean by this And do you think Einstein was correct in saying that 78
- Nowadays the mass media including TV radio and newspaper have become the essential part of our lives What is your opinion 56
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy Is it blessing or curse 80
- Can money bring happiness What are the factors for happiness 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...he following paragraphs. There are a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd glamorous film stars as role model by youngsters. In my opinion, one should ta...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, look, so, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 5.60731707317 375% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78367346939 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58390236598 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0973287475 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1538461538 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422858837357 0.215688989381 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155215911407 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150998682358 0.0843802449381 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29247471268 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519594416955 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.