Human activity has created severe conditions for plants and animals around the world. While certain people claim that industrialism is irreversible, others believe that measures can be taken to improve the situation. This essay will discuss that although the industrial impact is difficult to reduce due to the population constant demand for natural resources and the excessive amount of CO2 emissions produced by the factories, positive changes can be made by recycling and creating ecologically friendly plants.
It is commonly believed that the adverse effect of human activity on the environment is inevitable. The first reason is that the number of natural resources the industries need these days is constantly growing in proportion to the increasing demand for goods and services. Secondly, the factories, in which the commodities are produced, generate an excessive amount of CO2 emissions and waste; thus plants and animals suffer from air and soil pollution. Consequently, human activity implies that the environment is endangered in order to satisfy human needs.
Nevertheless, some people reckon that human activity can become environmentally friendly. To prevent the use of new natural resources, it is vital if people reused the existing products, and the enterprises produced new commodities from recycled materials. Apart from that, businessmen could consider establishing plants that generate energy from, for instance, solar or wind power, so that the factories emitted less CO2 and waste. To all intents and purposes, products reusing and recycling in conjunction with renewable energy sources for factories may reduce the severe impact mankind has on the environment nowadays.
In conclusion, human activity causes an adverse impact on plants and animals. Although some people think this negative tendency is inevitable, others claim that some changes can be made to improve the environmental conditions. This essay discussed that, although society constantly needs new natural resources to produce goods in factories, which emits toxic fumes and waste, the problem can be addressed by recycling and environmentally-friendly production.
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- The chart below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72670807453 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07915456826 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534161490683 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6823222725 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.714285714 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156549896999 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663067563488 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557078255037 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988447554826 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232851539395 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.