It is true that many art galleries and historical buildings are primarily visited by people from other regions, not the locals. While there are several reasons to account for this phenomenon, some measures should be taken to make these places more attractive to local people.
There are two principal causes leading to fewer inhabitants visiting local destinations. The first reason is that residents are too familiar with nearby tourist attractions. There is nothing new for them to discover when they are the chance to visit these famous places a second time. Secondly, the entrance tickets of well-known collections of art and historical sites are mostly exorbitant which means the locals who are underprivileged could not afford to pay visits. Meanwhile, visitors who usually live in affluence want to explore new sites regardless of how expensive the entrance fee is.
Fortunately, several solutions could be implemented to adopt this problem. The first approach would be that the local authorities should allocate budgets to invest in the facilities and quality of objects inside these institutions. This would be an effective way to attract residents. The second measure is that it should not be charged any entrance fee to the locals. This policy would encourage people to come here more regularly in order to broaden their knowledge about their hometown.
In conclusion, whereas there are some reasons why citizens from other parts of the world prefer to visit tourist attractions than the inhabitants, the government could address this issue with numerous effective steps.
It is true that many art galleries and historical buildings are primarily visited by people from other regions, not the locals. While there are several reasons to account for this phenomenon, some measures should be taken to make these places more attractive to local people.
There are two principal causes leading to fewer inhabitants visiting local destinations. The first reason is that residents are too familiar with nearby tourist attractions. There is nothing new for them to discover when they are the chance to visit these famous places a second time. Secondly, the entrance tickets of well-known collections of art and historical sites are mostly exorbitant which means the locals who are underprivileged could not afford to pay visits. Meanwhile, visitors who usually live in affluence want to explore new sites regardless of how expensive the entrance fee is.
Fortunately, several solutions could be implemented to adopt this problem. The first approach would be that the local authorities should allocate budgets to invest in the facilities and quality of objects inside these institutions. This would be an effective way to attract residents. The second measure is that it should not be charged any entrance fee to the locals. This policy would encourage people to come here more regularly in order to broaden their knowledge about their hometown.
In conclusion, whereas there are some reasons why citizens from other parts of the world prefer to visit tourist attractions than the inhabitants, the government could address this issue with numerous effective steps.
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by four types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 67
- The idea that the only way to mitigate a load of traffic in a metropolis nowadays is by minimizing the number of citizens commuting from home to work study and entertainment Although some people believe that this tendency is beneficial I would argue that 84
- The pie charts compare the water usage of various sectors of the economy in Sydney in two years 1997 and 2007 Overall it is clear that the sector which used the highest percentage of water was the food industry The percentage of total water use by the ser
- The idea that parks and outer spaces are replaced by gardens is more beneficial remains a source of controversy While there are many drawbacks of reducing the number of open spaces I strongly believe that the benefits are more remarkable On the one hand w 78
- It is said that the majority of television programmes had better concentrate on educating the young generation about the essential of social aspects While I partly agree with this idea other issues such as advertisement or entertainment cannot overlooked 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.344 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9351933081 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.769230769 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.503237554059 0.244688304435 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149683608585 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165855458461 0.0667982634062 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335445611086 0.151304729494 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.31665130236 0.056905535591 556% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.