Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Several people these days support the idea that governments and great enterprises are the exclusive organizations that can make contributions to improve the environmental condition since hardly anything individuals can do. From my perspective, whilst the merits of authorities and large companies should not be underestimated, the effective environment preservation require the concerted effort of each individual
On the one hand, there is a variety of explanations to support that the governments and great enterprises can make a difference in preserving the environment. The first and foremost reason is due to their financial stability. Since authorities and large companies have sufficient funding from various source, they afford to implement colossal projects on protecting the environment. By the way of illustration, the afforestation campaigns, which costs up to thousands of dollars, are being conducted in several nations with the aim of combating deforestation. Another justification which is worth considering is the legislation system. Enforcing acts against the act of damaging the environment condition with associating penalties can be a perfect means of diminishing the damage of human activities.
Nevertheless, the improvement of the environment can only be accomplished by the contribution of every segment of society. There seems to be no doubt that the amount of waste from households and each individual discharged on a daily basis is not insignificant at all. Hence, if each of the citizens is not fully aware of protecting the environment, there is no means of preventing the deterioration of the environment. Additionally, humble activities may result in tremendous impacts if they were done coordinatedly. Ocean cleanup campaigns can be a suitable case in point. Plenty of seashores has returned to the original cleanliness thanks to the outstanding endeavour of volunteers
In conclusion, whilst the government and large organizations can make contributions to the preservation of the environment at a macro level through colossal projects and legislation system. Each ordinary individual can also play an important part to protect the mother earth by tiniest activities
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- It s generally believed that success in fields such as art and sport can only be achieved if a person has natural talent However it s sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or artist Discuss both these views and give 84
- An increased number of people today change their career and living places in their lives Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools Others however believe that girls and boys benefit more from attending mixed schools Which education system do you think is better Why 11
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 84
- What is the cause and solution to global warming 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 685, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the outstanding endeavour of volunteers In conclusion, whilst the government and...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, no doubt, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.3376753507 300% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71732522796 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49619391912 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55623100304 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.2944433063 49.4020404114 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.357142857 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276486618126 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805193157742 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085254249079 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179025075676 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071420208144 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.