Governments should make laws about people’s nutrition and food choice. Others argue that it is their choice. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a widely-held view among people about whether citizens’ selection of food should be regulated by governments’ policies. While this measure might have some beneficial impacts, I still believe that the choice of food should be decided by each individual.
On the one hand, legislation about food consumption could act as a stimulus to improve citizens’ health. A standard of essential nutrition about what a person should take to maintain a healthy body would be set, thereby ensuring that nobody would be devoid of nutrients needed, which could trigger long-term repercussions. Recent research indicated that one of the most common diseases leading to life-threatening conditions was malnutrition, which undoubtedly created by the lacking of integral nutrients. Therefore, by being informed about eating habits, people would be more likely to adopt a properly balanced diet, which was scientifically proved to be the key to overall well-being.
On the other hand, there is no doubt that a law regulating people’s consumption of foods is unlikely to accommodate everyone’s needs. Indeed, there are many factors that account for a person’s selection of dishes for his meals ranging from taste preferences, nutritional demands to financial constraints. For instance, some people would choose to sit down at a fast-food store possibly because it might the be only lunch set that they could afford. Furthermore, by consuming a balanced diet filled with a wide range of foods, it is easier to ensure that people would consume adequate amounts of all essential nutrients. This not only reduces the risk of nutritional deficiencies, but it also provides numerous health benefits.
In conclusion, although governmental control of one’s consumption might be of help to a more science-based diet, I believe people must be allowed to consume whatever they desire.
- Death penalty is the best way to control and reduce serious crime To what extent do you agree 84
- Nowadays genetically modified food is widespread all over the world While proponents of GM crops ensure that these foods are safe for human consumption and help to increase food supplies others argue that their effects on health have not been studied long 89
- In some countries governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move out of large cities and into regional areas Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh its disadvantages 89
- Around the world many animal species become extinct Some people believe that countries and individuals must try to solve this problem Others believe that concentrating on problems of human beings is more important than those concerning species Discuss bot 84
- Some people believe that schools should teach students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities study together Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...st-food store possibly because it might the be only lunch set that they could afford. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45017182131 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12473000451 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621993127148 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6227383209 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.166666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169949427439 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663111688133 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057439945734 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107343540878 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074064268485 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.