Nowadays genetically modified food is widespread all over the world. While proponents of GM crops ensure that these foods are safe for human consumption and help to increase food supplies, others argue that their effects on health have not been studied long enough. Describe pros and cons of genetically modified foods.
In light of the proliferation of overpopulation, there is a widely-held view among people about the prevalence of genetically-engineered is detrimental to humans or not. While the utilization of this kind of food might bring some beneficial impacts on a global scale, there are certain negative influences that should be concerned.
On the one hand, it is no doubt true that foods produced through genetic modification have been assisted persons to tackle substantial issues to some extent. First, in order to create new crop variants, scientists have used a wide range of chemicals through several rigorous tests, which results in substantial crop variants such as tomatoes and broccoli bursting with cancer-fighting chemicals. That kind of crops would be able to grow in places where non-GM crops die, helping address the urgent problems of food shortage and hunger, especially when the earth’s population burgeons exponentially. Furthermore, this would facilitate crop yields, offering crop varieties that resist pests and disease, which undoubtedly acts as a stimulus to reduce the dependence on the land farms, thereby achieving sustainable development.
On the other hand, the action that inserting genes into an organism from an entirely different organism might trigger undesired side effects, posing a potential risk to human health. For instance, American scientists indicated that vitamin-enhanced crops of sweet potatoes caused allergic reactions in a small percentage of customers who purchased that product and even had put those persons in life-threatening conditions. Moreover, in order to maximize crop yields of bioengineered foods, the excessive consumption of chemical fertilizers and pesticides would not only decrease the nutrients level of such foods but also incentivize the potential development of herbicide-resistant weeds, which might breed environmental degradation.
In conclusion, it seems to me that genetically modified products might advantageous for human beings, however, more future researches should be performed to investigate the unpleasant consequences of genetically engineered foods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-11 | tata | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | bunxinh | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-31 | m_sepahi@ymail.com | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-04 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-22 | samdilnura | 63 | view |
- More people than ever before are traveling to other countries now Why Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- In many countries, children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider as it valuable experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What are your opinion on this? 78
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 67
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is becoming more popular but some people are against these measures Do the benefits of CCTV outweigh its drawbacks 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 826, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reby achieving sustainable development. On the other hand, the action that inser...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86173633441 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41485155056 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672025723473 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.8691430718 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.3 106.682146367 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1 20.7667163134 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.6 7.06120827912 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206991563389 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722080809059 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347372286437 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109298856174 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025734925246 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.7 13.0946893788 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.09 50.2224549098 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.3 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.