The idea that parks and outer spaces are replaced by gardens is more beneficial remains a source of controversy. While there are many drawbacks of reducing the number of open spaces, I strongly believe that the benefits are more remarkable.
On the one hand, when parks are substituted by gardens, some downsides can be anticipated. Firstly, the government has to subsidy a large amount of money to build up gardens, not to mention the annual fee to maintain the activities of the gardens such as the salary for workers who water plants on a daily basis. Secondly, open areas used to hold extra-curricular activities or get together would be no longer as popular as in previous days. Teenagers and young adults would find it difficult to organize outdoor games safely.
On the other hand, I would argue that gardens have various upsides related to health. The first reason is that when green plants are grown more, it would combat the problem of global warming as well as alleviate carbon emissions from private vehicles in metropolises. The second explanation is that gardens supply a surplus source of vegetables for urban inhabitants. It is undeniable that green foods provide nutritional value such as numerous essential vitamins and fiber which promote citizens' health. As nowadays many people suffer from chronic diseases like cardiovascular disease or obesity due to a lack of important nutrients in vegetables.
In conclusion, the trend of replacing parks and outer places with gardens brings out many positive and negative impacts on residents, it seems to me the advantage is more significant.
The idea that parks and outer spaces are replaced by gardens is more beneficial remains a source of controversy. While there are many drawbacks of reducing the number of open spaces, I strongly believe that the benefits are more remarkable.
On the one hand, when parks are substituted by gardens, some downsides can be anticipated. Firstly, the government has to subsidy a large amount of money to build up gardens, not to mention the annual fee to maintain the activities of the gardens such as the salary for workers who water plants on a daily basis. Secondly, open areas used to hold extra-curricular activities or get together would be no longer as popular as in previous days. Teenagers and young adults would find it difficult to organize outdoor games safely.
On the other hand, I would argue that gardens have various upsides related to health. The first reason is that when green plants are grown more, it would combat the problem of global warming as well as alleviate carbon emissions from private vehicles in metropolises. The second explanation is that gardens supply a surplus source of vegetables for urban inhabitants. It is undeniable that green foods provide nutritional value such as numerous essential vitamins and fiber which promote citizens' health. As nowadays many people suffer from chronic diseases like cardiovascular disease or obesity due to a lack of important nutrients in vegetables.
In conclusion, the trend of replacing parks and outer places with gardens brings out many positive and negative impacts on residents, it seems to me the advantage is more significant.
- The pie charts compare the water usage of various sectors of the economy in Sydney in two years 1997 and 2007 Overall it is clear that the sector which used the highest percentage of water was the food industry The percentage of total water use by the ser
- The table illustrates how much money was donated to the developing countries in the period from 2006 to 2010 by the US UK charities to support technological development Overall it is evident that most of the countries experienced an increase during the gi 73
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- Some people think that children should aim to their best at what they are doing while others believe it is not necessary for them Discuss both views and give your own opinion 88
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13358778626 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82828548146 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63358778626 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.698238039 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.083333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362914702819 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123523154382 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170827861658 0.0667982634062 256% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267866716455 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.286649911649 0.056905535591 504% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.