There is no need for newspapers in the modern world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of no necessitate to publish newspapers in the contemporary world and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of everlasting news in newspapers is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that using news websites can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
Some people and historians believe that printing news is vital and can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of indelible news, as well as reliable facts, are inextricably bound up. They think that newspapers can be used as a historical reference in the future, but because the contents of websites can be deleted throughout their lifespan, they are not trustable sources for recording events. According to a study undertaken by UCLA university, 23% of the news on the website has changed over 18 years.
Within the realm of technology, uploading the news on websites increase the consequence of rapid access to the latest news across the world. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of destroying the environment could relate to this reality that the demerits of damaging forests pertain to produce requirement paper of newspapers. For example, a prestigious university conduct a study and asserted that the cost of uploading news of one newspaper on a website is 10% of printing that.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the drawback of the printed newspaper far outweighs its benefits. Not only do the advantages of news websites prove the significance of quick and easy access to the entire news around the world, but also pinpoint the significance of protecting forests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-31 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-05-24 | Sridarani | 69 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-01-22 | topraveesh | 88 | view |
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization 85
- In social situations some people believe that it is better to be a good listener than a good talker Do you agree or disagree 64
- Nowadays Television has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news & awareness and for some, it acts like a companion. What is your opinion? 88
- People usually mix their private and professional life What are the pros and cons 88
- People dispute travel is or is not a component of a quality education Some believe travel is overrated What is your opinion 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23154362416 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99534381846 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58389261745 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.1005628904 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.727272727 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102125401198 0.242375264174 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402963233842 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397365705497 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658194457042 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207942711799 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.