The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000.
The manifested chart evinces the figure of marriages and separations of couples per thousand during a quarter of 20 century commencing from 1975 in the country of the United Kingdom.
As can be seen in the graph, the number of total marriages enhanced from well under 500,000 in 1975 to about 650,000 in 1985, accompanied by a slight decline in 1990. While considerably dwindling in 1995 (just below 600,000), this value modestly improved during the last five years by 2000. On the contrary, the number of divorces inexorably increased from approximately 90,000 to 250,000 during these years with various slopes. For example, the slope of the last 10 years was lower than that of the first five years.
Regarding the number of marriages, whether for the first or the second marriage indicated by the red and green line, respectively, it can be said that about the former one, its figure enhanced from around 340,000 in 1975 to ca. 400,000 in 1985. In the following, it went through a decrease till to 300,000 in 2000. In contrast, the number of people experiencing a second marriage constantly went up from 150,000 from the date of initiation investigation, i.e., 1975, to 270,000 in 2000 apart from a minimum in 1995.
Overall, the similarity among the trend of lines demonstrates that these lines can be categorized into two subsections. The first one is for total marriages and 1st marriages. Nonetheless, the second one can be dedicated to divorces and 2nd marriages.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-14 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | view | |
2023-09-07 | abid1 | view | |
2023-09-07 | abid1 | view | |
2023-07-30 | Mike-Huang | 78 | view |
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 84
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 89
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 73
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons.Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 78
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast, the number of people experiencing a second marriage constantly went up from ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nonetheless, regarding, second, well, while, apart from, for example, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.995951417 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77939866856 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570850202429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1900500263 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.833333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 5.23603664747 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190798247637 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676650187009 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506507823677 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109895643966 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403955844405 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast, the number of people experiencing a second marriage constantly went up from ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nonetheless, regarding, second, well, while, apart from, for example, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.995951417 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77939866856 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570850202429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1900500263 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.833333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 5.23603664747 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190798247637 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676650187009 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506507823677 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109895643966 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403955844405 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.