Some observers say that police officer should be recruited from the communities where they work so that they have local knowledge. Other people say that this is unnecessary, or even undesirable. Where do you stand on this debate? Is local knowledge essential in modern policing?
Needless to say that the role of trustworthy police in societies is paramount important. Notwithstanding, according to some, it is a desideratum that the police workforce should be a resident in the proximity they dwell in. Others put forward that having this feature for police is of no avail or even makes the situation exacerbate. I clearly go for the first credence, and in the following, both facets will be discussed succinctly.
On the one hand, those who are the proponents of the first notion aver that should a person have an acquaintance with the local area, they can go very well with the native people if a grievant situation breaks out. Accordingly, the raised problems would tend to be settled down in a tranquilized milieu in lieu of breaking out a fracas. For example, local police indicate sensitivity for each person; therefore, they know how to communicate and socialize with people in each quarter. Moreover, such policies as they have brought up in the community are familiar with the rendezvous of malefactors, intuitively giving rise to acting on them successfully.
Meanwhile, those who are the advocators of the latter credence maintain that having local knowledge is no use, or even in some issue makes it worsen. Firstly, the taken up police might have a personal problem with indigenousness, and now they come up to retaliate. In this situation, as bestowed a plethora of power, they can effortlessly bring dire tribulation to revenge, which is inequitable towards law-abiding citizens. Secondly, after a while, a person who is not a denizen can get accustomed to the area, imbibing with all walks of life governing in the area where they are consigned. To this end, it is unnecessary to hire up police with local information.
To briefly recapitulate, I single out the notion mentioned in the first paragraph. And the essay can be boiled down to two items: (1) resident forces are familiar with districts and the behavior of people living in each neighborhood community. (2) After hiring, some police are going to take revenge because of having a problem with some persons previously, as well as polices from outside of the area can adapt themselves with medium immediately.
- Some observers say that police officer should be recruited from the communities where they work so that they have local knowledge Other people say that this is unnecessary or even undesirable Where do you stand on this debate Is local knowledge essential 78
- It is sometimes said that governments should dedicate a fixed proportion of their country s income to foreign aid each year and this fixed proportion should always be donated to other countries Opponents of this idea however say that aid should have no fi 55
- Crime appears to be rising in most countries in the world, especially among young people. Identify the possible causes of this trend, and propose some solutions you think would be effective. 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected personal relationships Has this become a positive or negative development 84
- Some feel executives in large companies should receive high salaries while others think they are paid too much compared to ordinary workers Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, briefly, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0272479564 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98860524607 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550408719346 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0247970014 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.3125 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270759559285 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856468310871 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486275420609 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160792001584 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530547769163 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.