The charts below give information about the national distribution of water and the average domestic water usage in Asturia.
The two pie charts depict how water was used in Astoria in 2010. The former one highlights the distribution throughout the country whereas the latter one reveals how usage was divided within households.
Overall, it can be manifested that the majority of the water used in Astoria was for domestic purpose. In that, even though the highest percentage of water was used outdoor(gardening) most of it was for indoor use.
First of all, most of Astoria's water, more than half of the total (55%), was siphoned into domestic use. The second highest consumers were commercial users with one-fifth proportion and leakage accounted for half of it. Interestingly, users and institutions amounted for 7 % and were, therefore, the lowest consumers of water while the water which was not metered was one per cent more (8%).
Secondly, the predominant use of water in houses was for the gardening purpose (40%or 108,00 litres). The amount of water used for bathroom and toilet had an equal share, with 20% each. The proportion of water in laundry and kitchen was 12%(32,160 litres) and 8%(21,440liters) respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-30 | mansipatel | 76 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentages of industry sector s contribution in the economy of India and Turkey in 2000 73
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged Others believe that children who are taught to co operate rather than compete become more useful adults Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The chart below shows the percentages of industry sector s contribution in the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 84
- The pie graphs below show the result of survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which girls participate 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, therefore, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1581920904 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85050776545 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598870056497 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.5003363418 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0909090909 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1824566149 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085696582377 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362979894418 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123710648751 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00808237110193 0.0819641961636 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, therefore, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1581920904 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85050776545 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598870056497 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.5003363418 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0909090909 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1824566149 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085696582377 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362979894418 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123710648751 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00808237110193 0.0819641961636 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.