The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The line graph depicts the weekly consumption of four different meat in Europe country from 1979 to 2004. The units are given in grams.
Overall, it can be manifested that intake of almost all meats declined during 25 years except chicken.
To begin with, in the initial period the consumption of meat was highest around 250 grams after that it declines drastically in the year between 1979and 1984. Then beef dropped continually and reached at 100 grams per person per week. However, the consumption of fish is least consume among all other three types of meat. In 1979 it was just 60 grams in the former year and after 5-year it's level dropped at 50 grams, it remains stable up to the year 2001 the at the end decreased slightly.
Furthermore, chicken and lamb consumption had the same ratio in the starting period of about 150 grams in 1979. The grams of Lamb then dramatically plugged over 50 in the year 2004. In contrast, although the consumption of chicken was lowest than Beef, it augmented and reached at peak level in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | zhao_kangg | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | Trác Ngọc | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | nguyenanhkhoi1702 | 67 | view |
| 2022-04-13 | Carrotte | view | |
| 2021-12-02 | oscar_666 | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentages of industry sector s contribution in the economy of India and Turkey in 2000 73
- The chart shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canada provinces between 2001 and 2006 78
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television and a fridge Do the disadvantage of this development for society outright the advantages 73
- The charts below give information about the national distribution of water and the average domestic water usage in Asturia 76
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
... initial period the consumption of meat was highest around 250 grams after that it declines...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, then, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73076923077 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43661960156 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598901098901 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0395952848 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146154009364 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637781290203 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706411844238 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102507423757 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715145217962 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.