The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020.
The provided graphics demonstrate and predict the statistic of transportation and the total amount of carbon dioxide released in the two British countries over the course of 21 years, starting in 2000.
A first glance at the graphs reveals that both levels of traffic and the toxic emission underwent an upsurge and are anticipated to ascend in the future. In addition to this, according to the bar chart, it is manifest that the influx of exhaust car discharging outnumbered that of the others.
As is shown in the first graph, means of transport in two mentioned regions in 2010 was nearly 40 million, which was a two-fold in escalation comparing to its commencing in the year 2000 (with 20 million). It is also noticeable that its data skyrocketed to more than 60 million vehicles and are forecasted to increase with no sign of reduction in the end of the course.
Now, turning to the other details, the amount of toxic fume in the private car category not only held the largest share with around 2.3 million but also is estimated to reach its peak at 3 million in the next decade. Following that, both types of large engine vehicles, trucks and vans, released less than 1 million tons of CO2; however, in the last ten years, that of trucks is predicted to increase to approximately 1.3 million. By contrast, the local vehicle posed threat the least to the environment, with a mere level of 0.5 million tons, and is expected to share an analogy in 2021.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-18 | chuc linh | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-20 | jahidhumayun@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | kachyy | 80 | view |
| 2021-01-05 | Cowy | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-28 | quanglnd31 | 67 | view |
- The charts below show the number of working hours per week in industrial sector in four European countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons with relevant 89
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other while others think that people have become more independent 89
- The graph below shows the cinema attendance of people on different days of the week in 2003 2005 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 59
- The diagrams below give information about changes in a student accommodation 84
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education center in the year 2009 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7265625 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63423783747 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58984375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.8617393793 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.25 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0943414201007 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403575850035 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0219378296383 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0554550839623 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253096748618 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7265625 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63423783747 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58984375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.8617393793 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.25 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0943414201007 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403575850035 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0219378296383 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0554550839623 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253096748618 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.