The chart below shows annual average spending on clothes per person in the US in 1985, 1995 and 2005.
The bar chart gives information about how much money was spent on four different types of clothes in the United States during the period from 1985 to 2005.
Overall, there were general upward trends in the amount of money paid for these categories over the given period. It is also clear that the expenditure on women’s clothes was higher than the others.
In the first year, 100 dollars was allocated to boys’ clothes, which was equal to that of girl’s ones. After that, the spending on boys’ clothes increased slightly to just around 105 dollars per person in 1998 and remained until ten years later. At the same time, the clothing expenses on girls’ clothes in this country experienced a continual rise to approximately 160 dollars per person in 2005.
In comparison, the spending on clothes for males was much slower than the figure for females, at about 300 dollars and 500 dollars respectively. In the following decade, the expenditure on men’s clothing went up noticeably to nearly 420 dollars before falling slowly by 20 dollars while women’ clothes saw a dramatic growth to reach its peak of over 600 dollars in 2005.
- More and more people are opting for ready made food instead of home made food Do you think this option has MORE advantages or disadvantages 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts show the difference in how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015 75
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 78
- The table below gives information about the values of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9481865285 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48719775016 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632124352332 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5208279777 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.375 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188425291018 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826205120093 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649622375029 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108358072415 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545003753735 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.