online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Virtual learning is a phenomenal model of education recent days due to the popularity of the internet and modern devices. Consequently, many people assert that conventional classes are no longer vital. I am going to demonstrate the pros and cons of both methods and express my viewpoint toward the mentioned statement.
It is hard to overstate the enormous benefits web-based classes have brought about. Since there is no requirement for real estate or staff, the cost provided for online course are considerably cost-efficent. Affordable fee allows a large number of people to attending classes. Aside from financial issue, time and geography boundaries also collapse with the advent of cyber learning. As a result, fortunately, an abundance of rural area habitants together with those who possess little amount of time for travelling, can easily access to various available courses online.
Besides, traditional form of schooling still have many values that could not be replaced. Being taught by actual teachers in person and surrounded by a bulk of classmates offer students a lot more opportunities to experience and cultivate either their knowledge or skill. Physical classrooms give learners social interactions and chances to work in teams, which will advantage developing interpersonal skills. Furthermore, it is only traditionsl classrooms model that own essential elabrate lab set-up and equipment for majors like chemistry and physics. On this aspects, e-learning pale in comparisons with ordinary schooling.
To sum up, I believe two kinds of classes both have the incredible features to suit a diversity of students. However, certainly, conventional form of teaching is perenial and can be substituded by no means of technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The given pie charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or pursuing further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison
- To learn a language well we should learn about the country as well as the cultures and their lifestyle Agree or not 56
- some students prefer to take a gap year between high school and university to work or to travel Do the disadvantages outweigh the advanatges 84
- some people believe that everyone has right to access to university education and that governments should make it free for al students no matter what financial background they have To what extent you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ly cost-efficent. Affordable fee allows a large number of people to attending classes. Aside from...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...r majors like chemistry and physics. On this aspects, e-learning pale in comparisons...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, furthermore, however, so, still, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51492537313 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07674539388 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.716417910448 0.561755894193 128% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8003831397 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0796166233813 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0235334084408 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299540958793 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0460055282349 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121322005079 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.