the diagram below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Looking at the map in more detail it can be seen that development that have taken place at West Park Secondary school since it is architecture in 1950. We can see big changes from 1950 to 2010.
In contrast with 1950 to 1980 changes occurred farmland replaced to sports field and instead of small houses built left side car park and in right side science block. School became the main building in 1980. The main road and playground remained in his place. These changes have been within 1950 to 1980.
Despite such changes in 2010 started big changes yet such as sport fields remove to right side half part of playground takes sport field. Car park which was build in 1980, now expand and instead of sport field now has car park. Playground is reduce. Main road is not changed. Science block has been modernise. The school opportunity on your place and renovate.
To sum up total, between 1950 to 2010 we can to understand that were big changes and construction and this led to great development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-01 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | Johndavisvu | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | kevann | 11 | view |
| 2022-01-09 | kevann | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-09 | kevann | view |
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food 78
- the graph 73
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food 78
- The bar chart shows the participation of children in selected leisure activities in Australia 78
- 4 More and more people go on touring and travelling What are its advantages and disadvantages Give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... see big changes from 1950 to 2010. In contrast with 1950 to 1980 changes occurred farm...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
...t field now has car park. Playground is reduce. Main road is not changed. Science bloc...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'modernised'.
Suggestion: modernised
... is not changed. Science block has been modernise. The school opportunity on your place a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second, in contrast, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64406779661 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31685264658 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.4343266216 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.2307692308 112.824112599 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.6153846154 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238187105375 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845607976033 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739302496 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152799035113 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830412514197 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 92.12 61.2550243902 150% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 3.6 10.3012195122 35% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.04 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.6 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.