The line graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the conveyance of goods by various methods of transport in the UK from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, between 1974 and 2002, the volume of goods delivered by road, water and pipeline was subject to a significant rise, whereas the quantities of goods carried by rail experienced a remarkable fluctuation. Additionally, road was the most important form of delivery from 1974 to 2002 in the UK.
As can be seen from the graph, in 1974, road was the most popular form of transport, which conveyed 70 million tonnes, nearly double the number of goods carried by water and rail, at 40 million tonnes. Meanwhile, road was the least common form of delivery, which transported 5 million tonnes.
Between 1974 and 2002, the quantities of goods conveyed by road witnessed a significant growth of 95 million tonnes, while there was a remarkable increase in the volume of goods carried by water, climbing to 60 million tonnes. Likewise, the quantities of goods conveyed by pipeline experienced a dramatic growth to 20 million tonne. By contrast, the volume of goods delivered by rail fell minimally to 28 million tonne, followed by a recovery to 40 million tonnes.
- The graph below shows the changes in maximum number of Asian elephants between 1997 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- In some countries people prefer to live alone more often than in the past Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- Many criminals reoffend after they have been punished Why do some people continue to commit crimes after they have been punished and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 73
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 73
- The graph below shows the price of bananas in 4 different countries from 1996 to 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 53
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 32.9175257732 0% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 937.175257732 104% => OK
No of words: 196.0 206.0 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97959183673 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79509894144 2.54303337028 110% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 127.690721649 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464285714286 0.622605031667 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 290.88556701 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 16.3608247423 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.3438128953 44.8134815571 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 76.5299724578 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 16.8248392259 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 4.34317383033 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181996139041 0.216113520407 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107511745508 0.0766984524023 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674904110603 0.0603063233224 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153372850492 0.12726935374 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677536898685 0.0580467560999 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 8.37731958763 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 70.7449484536 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 8.71597938144 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 41.2886597938 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 8.62886597938 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 8.54432989691 136% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.