Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall student grade averages at Omega have risen by 30 percent. Potential employers, looking at this dramatic rise in grades, believe that grades at Omega are inflated and do not accurately reflect student achievement; as a result, Omega graduates have not been as successful at getting jobs as have graduates from nearby Alpha University. To enable its graduates to secure better jobs, Omega University should terminate student evaluation of professors.
The above Argument does not have any logical grounds and thus it should not be supported as the new system is helping the higher administration to get the reviews of the students and they are the main consumers and look at any domain the consumer provides the best evaluation of the product.
Firstly, enhancement in the system is executed to bring out the full potential of the staff because if their teaching is not satifactory their would be complaints regarding them and the management would not tolerate that, and if every teacher works to their full capabilities whole heartedly then obviously their is going to be a rise in the acadmics.
Secondly, The major issue in the above discussion is that the graduates are not able to secure good jobs, main reasons for this can be that these individuals are not ready to face the corporate sector. To solve this pseudo interviews should be conducted by the management to improve the confidence as well as provide them an outlook of the intervieing pannel. Moreover, They should motivate the students to perform in such in extra-curricular activities which will help out in improving the resume of the students.
Thirdly, Omega university should analyse the curriculumn of the Alpha University as it would help them to understand what are the major drawbacks in their university due to which they are not able to perform well in the industry and they should cover them up.
To conclude, the problem stated above cannot be resolved by changing the acadmic part of studies but it can be resolved by changing the extracurriculars and introducing new things tasks to the students.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-25 | tomlee0205 | 66 | view |
2023-05-26 | shubham1102 | 60 | view |
2022-10-10 | fangzr2 | 58 | view |
2022-08-17 | devansh66 | 66 | view |
2022-08-17 | devansh66 | 66 | view |
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- The Government should focus on immediate problems and on the anticipated problems 50
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- the best way for a society to prepare the young ones for leadership in government industry or other field is by instilling them the sense of cooperation not competition 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 10 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 10 2
No. of Sentences: 7 15
No. of Words: 275 350
No. of Characters: 1333 1500
No. of Different Words: 146 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.072 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.847 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.789 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 89 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 72 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 53 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 39.286 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.209 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 1 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.44 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.44 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.15 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...bilities whole heartedly then obviously their is going to be a rise in the acadmics. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 2260.96107784 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 275.0 441.139720559 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92727272727 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82788008677 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 204.123752495 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523636363636 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 705.55239521 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 19.7664670659 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.8473053892 171% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.5377445491 57.8364921388 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 193.571428571 119.503703932 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.2857142857 23.324526521 168% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.8571428571 5.70786347227 295% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132652957011 0.218282227539 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525042614232 0.0743258471296 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459734315172 0.0701772020484 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069377740795 0.128457276422 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417447403545 0.0628817314937 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 14.3799401198 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 48.3550499002 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.197005988 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.32208582834 116% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 98.500998004 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 29.0 12.3882235529 234% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.6 11.1389221557 158% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.9071856287 151% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.