Some believe that advances in technology are increasing the gap between rich b vand poor while others think the opposite is happening. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion
People have different opinions whether or not technology has widened the gap between rich and poor. I believe that technology has given poor people the opportunity to get education at very low cost.
Some people think that technology has separated the rich from the poor. The latest gadgets have made ease in wealthy people’s life like automatic house. They can control their house with one click of remotes’ button. Rich people have become more updated with the modern devices. For example, Jeff Bezos’s house is made up of latest technology as voice- activated oven, shower and automatic washroom which changes the climate according to the weather. A poor person could never afford or install this type of technology at their home.
No doubt billionaire has upgraded their life in this high-tech era, but low-income communities also can take an advantage of it in different way. They can use internet at minimal cost to do research for science, history, mathematics and many other subjects. For example, in all India, under 18 students have a free access of internet. Anyone under this condition can use unlimited data and free websites, this is blessing for those who cannot arrange expenses of school or tuition fees. With the affordable technology and free online material, the vulnerable students do just well in the exam as well-off students.
Although there is a huge difference between rich and poor due to technology, but people of all background can take benefit of the internet and they can educate them by learning from free websites.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-15 | Amritpal_kaur | 73 | view |
- Many teenagers have their own smartphones Discuss the advantage and disadvantage of this and give your own opinion 78
- Some believe that advances in technology are increasing the gap between rich b vand poor while others think the opposite is happening Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 73
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The internet means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- you are travelling and someone to do you a favor while you are gone Write a letter asking a neighbour or friend for help In your letter where you are going what the favor is why you need this friend to help 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
People have different opinions whether or not technology has widened the gap between ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
... example, Jeff Bezos’s house is made up of latest technology as voice- activated oven, sh...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'free access'.
Suggestion: free access
...e, in all India, under 18 students have a free access of internet. Anyone under this conditio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, for example, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1309.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11328125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57399942161 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61328125 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9671969323 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140582337548 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603495425316 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810706206961 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105105443881 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746797393971 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.