With all the troubles in the world today, money spent on space exploration is a complete waste. The money could be better spent on other things. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (Give reasons for your answer and give any relevant example or experience you have to support your answer.)
Recently, the phenomenon of space explorations has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “are they worth spending money?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that governments should spend the money on basic human needs I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the technological and scientific standpoint, the outer space exploration is bound up inextricably with cosmos investigation, which indicates it might lead to both launching space rockets and interstellar travel. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between space missions and the manned space flights as well as an exponential increase in information gathering. Their academic criticism was impressive. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to alien planets, extraterrestrial life, and deep space voyage alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of discovering the universe is correlated positively with not only the space shuttle programs but also the satellite technology.
Within the realm of socioeconomic status, without the slightest doubt, space research attribute to huge costs, in that it would come down to money waste and an imperfect world. A salient example of such attribution is space tourism, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take revolutionized modern life for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint global warming problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to poverty, food shortage, and even the endangered environment. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of financial aids to poor nations.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that governments should spend as much money as possible on human’s current crucial problems. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
- Mass media like TV and newspapers influence people particularly young generation Do you think it works a pivot to shape the society 77
- The major purpose of television is to educate not to entertain Do you agree or disagree 85
- The importance of travel seems to be over rated Brilliant scholars locked themselves at home Travel is important for education To what extent to you agree or disagree 88
- Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people s life and work 88
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...stion “are they worth spending money?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that governmen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1207.87684729 155% => OK
No of words: 330.0 242.827586207 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68181818182 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18978655901 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 139.433497537 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678787878788 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 379.143842365 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8896763502 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145154432822 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392607164081 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334003872652 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806358399589 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00581451242962 0.0609392437508 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 55.0591133005 227% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.