The bar chart below illustrates the changes in the total time spent on three different kinds of phone calls in the UK over the period of 1995-2002.
Originally, in 1995, the British public talked over 70 billion minutes on local-fixed lines, almost a 40 on national & international and a mere one billion using mobile phones. The usage of local lines increased, reaching its maximum of 90 billion minutes in 1999. After that, it finished the period with a bit more than 70 billion minutes as it was in the beginning of the period.
Meanwhile, the mobile and national & international dialing were gaining more popularity each year. Thus, the time spent on national & international was rising gradually and ended the period up with a total time of 61 billion minutes in 2002. Although mobile phones were not used greatly at first, they obtained a modest 12 billion minutes and then grew up rapidly finishing the period with 44 billion minutes.
Overall, the usage of both mobile and national & international lines expanded significantly over the period, but local lines were still more popular.
- friend has decided to switch careers but isn’t sure which to choose. What advice would you give them? Provide reasons and examples to support your response. 70
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts on families and societies? 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 56
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.Causes of land degradation by region 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... kinds of phone calls in the UK over the period of 1995-2002. Originally, in 1...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, still, then, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0773480663 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7151604779 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8995714852 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198911004693 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947150361704 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881552876316 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135871593802 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106998403086 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.