two maps
The two layout illustrate the information about changes had been done in Museum within 10 years of period. It can be seen that several changes were made between 1998 and 2000.
Firstly, in 1998, the shape of museum was rectangular with garden at centre. Additionally, there were two permanent exhibition rooms at eastern side and western side of museum also, cafe was located at northern direction of garden. The tickets and entrance/exit zone was situated at southern side of garden. Moreover, there was one temporary exhibition room was constructed at south west corner and shop, water closet and bags and coats area were made at south west corner.
Secondly, many changes had been done in 2008 such as shop water closet and bag and coats area were replaced with permanent exhibition room. Whereas, bags, coats and shops had been constructed at southern eastern direction. In addition, western side permanent exhibition room had been replaced with restaurant at northern side and temporary exhibition room at western side. Furthermore, cafe area was cut down for water closet while garden area was cut down for cafe sitting area and fountains.
Overall in 2008, museum had more facility with restaurant cafe sitting area fountain as compared to 1998.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1568627451 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55209090988 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504901960784 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4617087193 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6363636364 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 5.23603664747 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0347678926466 0.215688989381 16% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0179379943425 0.103423049105 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384903133365 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0291495679325 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335098786109 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.