Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual person to address. In other words, we have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment is at an international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
While there has long been a heated debate over the matter of preventing climate change which some argue that can only be tackled at an international scale, I would totally oppose that assumption. In the contrary, I firmly contend that this colossal issue can only be quickly prevented if individuals and governments are involved in, and also having a factor of international scale.
Apparently, there has been a pivotal movement enacted by the Paris government in 2015. The ‘COP21’ policy that aiming at getting nations around the world to join in so as to reduce the rising of global average temperature down to the standard level. And many nations now recognizing the far-reaching challenges that humankind have to deal with, thus they are almost willing to lend support to this movement.
The had been certain steps taken by developed countries in order to help the environment. For example, federal governments in Canada encouraged the citizens to use LED bulbs which consume up to 80 per cent less energy and cheaper than conventional bulbs. In addition to that, they initiated a huge project which promotes gas-smart cars such as hybrids and fully electric vehicles to be more affordable to the citizens. There are also heavy taxes that implemented to focus on those company that burning coal and fuel. And some similar movements also took place in the US.
Even though the international and national scale steps are imperative. It is intangible that personal action combined with governmental action can advance further in the matter of preventing climate change. Presumably, if every single person stopped using too much energy and wasting water, disposed of their trash properly, started recycling more, then it could do wonders for the entire planet. Therefore, an individual’s responsibility is crucial in helping to curb environmental issues.
In conclusion, given the reasons mentioned above, the role of individual citizens should not be neglected. Nonetheless, in general, in order to address this problem successfully, individual citizens and government at national and international scale must have to play their parts in this matter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-17 | chinh11111 | 89 | view |
- International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages 84
- Obesity is an increasing public health problem in some parts of the world Explain some possible reasons for this problem and suggest some solutions 56
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- 18 02 2023 New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ing nations around the world to join in so as to reduce the rising of global average tem...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'those companies'?
Suggestion: this company; those companies
...eavy taxes that implemented to focus on those company that burning coal and fuel. And some si...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, if, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31486880466 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92028753493 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644314868805 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2437495776 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.9375 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185574228393 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513657646389 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459927823825 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966449180858 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455697662309 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.