It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of choosing talent or teaching and its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, general picture is that children are born with special talents, while other people are of the opinion that youngsters have the ability to become an expert in music or sport through teaching. In my mind, teaching comes first with respect to hardworking and commitment.
Obviously, throughout history, we come across various cases in which teaching is far more important than talents. For instance, Einstein as one of the most well-known scientists of 20th century, was fired from school due to the lack of talent. His mother, however, undertook the responsibility of his Albert’s teaching at home and so the world witnessed flourishing of her young boy’s natural gift. Consequently, Einstein could develop his breath-taking theories on relativity thanks to an appropriate training of his competent mother. Of course, his commitment and hardworking must be taken into account.
Likewise, Edison as a famous inventor and entrepreneur stated that “one percent relates to talent and other 99% of hardworking is need to being a prodigy.” By pursuing this idea, he carried out 999 experiments to build a precedented bulb, nevertheless each time he faced to fail. Eventually, at 1000th trial he came up with an innovative idea which led lights on the world’s dark nights because of learning from his experiences.
On the other hand, we shouldn’t take no notice of faculties’ role. Talents and being a gifted person pave the way to become a champion or a leading musician more conveniently. As a tangible example, Shakespeare could create his masterpieces without any significant formal educations. Hence, the capabilities of such individuals as Shakespeare stem from their talents and intelligence.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on both sides, I am inclined to believe that the merits of teaching, particularly by a beloved person, far outweigh natural talent. Imagine, if Einstein was not taught and discovered by his mother, who could move the borders of physics?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-26 | AnnaAlysia | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-03 | annaalysia007 | 56 | view |
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | writingme | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | Trinh Bella | 80 | view |
- City population has been growing rapidly To cope with this problem should we rely on city planners or new policies 88
- What are the advantages of cheaper public transportation What will cause us to achieve it 88
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Scientists believe that the increasing average temperature is an issue What caused global warming and present solution to reduce its effect 88
- Governments should not put too much attention on arts such as theaters Governments should allocate more funds to areas of concern Do you agree with this opinion or not Use your own experience to support your idea 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, general pictur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, well, while, for instance, of course, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37125748503 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09775359034 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661676646707 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.171744141 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.125 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164233474589 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464586684078 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514707156873 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0857769128484 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434665173074 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.