The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant
The process of evolution of modern horse from its ancestor Eohippus is elucidated in the given diagram.
As can be seen, this development took 40 million years and it had four stages in total. In the first stage, it was termed as ‘Eohippus’, which was smaller in size, with four-toed foot. After 10 million years, it transformed into ‘Mesohippus’ which was slightly larger in size than its predecessor. It had slightly thick fur on the back of its neck. A notable change occurred here was in the foot structure, where the number of toes in its foot reduced to three, with a prominent middle one. The ‘Merychippus’ evolved 15 million years ago, which was even larger in size. It had a larger foot structure.It also had thicker fur and longer tail. . The modern horse, the largest in its lineage, has a complex foot structure. Its toes gave way to a hoof, which can balance its body mass .Thick coat of longer fur on the back of its neck and tail make it look very distinct from its predecessors.
Overall, tremendous changes occurred to the modern horse throughout its evolution, with a special focus on its foot structure.
- The use of software makes it unnecessary for people to know how to spell words correctly these days Do you agree with this statement 84
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age Others think they should begin after 7 years of age Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The plans below show the changes at a small theater in 2010 and 2012 67
- Some employers are willing to give their workers a certain amount of unpaid leave believing this benefits the individual and the organization Other employers see no merit in this arrangement and discourage it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: smaller
...age it was termed as Eohippus which was smaller in size with fourtoed foot After 10 million yea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: larger
...rmed into Mesohippus which was slightly larger in size than its predecessor It had slightly th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: larger
...ved 15 million years ago which was even larger in size It had a larger foot structureIt also h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eIt also had thicker fur and longer tail The modern horse the largest in its line...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55329949239 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41948338878 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517766497462 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 197.0 22.4926829268 876% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 897.0 112.824112599 795% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 197.0 22.9334400587 859% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 21.0 5.23603664747 401% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0886544440421 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886544440421 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0610108859339 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234234534974 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 98.5 13.2329268293 744% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -111.56 61.2550243902 -182% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 77.8 10.3012195122 755% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.29 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.69 8.06136585366 207% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 80.8 10.9970731707 735% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 11.0658536585 506% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: smaller
...age it was termed as Eohippus which was smaller in size with fourtoed foot After 10 million yea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: larger
...rmed into Mesohippus which was slightly larger in size than its predecessor It had slightly th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: larger
...ved 15 million years ago which was even larger in size It had a larger foot structureIt also h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eIt also had thicker fur and longer tail The modern horse the largest in its line...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55329949239 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41948338878 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517766497462 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 197.0 22.4926829268 876% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 897.0 112.824112599 795% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 197.0 22.9334400587 859% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 21.0 5.23603664747 401% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0886544440421 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886544440421 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0610108859339 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234234534974 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 98.5 13.2329268293 744% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -111.56 61.2550243902 -182% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 77.8 10.3012195122 755% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.29 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.69 8.06136585366 207% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 80.8 10.9970731707 735% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 11.0658536585 506% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.