The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph provide information about percentage of unemployment rates in rural and urban areas in the year 2012.
Overall, the percentage of people without jobs in rural areas outweigh the ones in cities throught the period.
Looking at rural unemployment, in the first quarter there were around 6.5% people who were not working. However, in the next quarter the unemployment rates drastically reduced to approximately 5%. In the following quarter unemployment rates saw an opposite trend and increased to about 5.5% and reported to be 5% in the fourth quarter.
With regards to urban areas, the percentage of unwaged workers were significantly less compared to rural areas with just over 2%. Nonetheless, the percentage increased significantly reaching to 4% in the second quarter but there was a downward trend till the third quarter where unemployment situation was same as that of first quarter(2%). Anyway, in the fourth quarter the situation was dire as more people were jobless and the percentage was nearly equal to rural unemployment rates (5%).
- Although more and more people read the news on internet newspapers will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people Do you agree or disagree 56
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te trend and increased to about 5.5% and reported to be 5% in the fourth quarter....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, first, however, if, look, nonetheless, second, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29585798817 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91238492045 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532544378698 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0144730225 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.875 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10174644309 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051122210261 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504155359322 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702846152912 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056536127564 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.