Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no doubt that environmental health is essential. While some people believe that it's the job of government and colossal companies to take improve it. I adamantly agree with those who argue that individuals play a key role in environmental development.
Firstly, while it is evident that environmental problems such as global warming and climate change constitute a threat to society. It is the governments duty to enact it by introducing ordinances and environmental policies. This can be done by supporting local producers and small scale companies, which, unlike large organizations generate less waste. Looking at companies, as they have a huge scope, they could limit usage of paper and use LED lights which consume less energy when compared to ordinary lights. Furthermore, dumping of waste into rivers and lakes can be stopped by using an alternative if reusing water. These techniques can act as a catalyst, helping the public to adapt to such ideologies.
However, most people are oblivious towards their actions and are unaware that small changes could better the environment. This is because, if individuals limit their water consumption and usage of non-renewable resources, environmental health could boost, and, in turn, enhancing the wellbeing of people. Moreover, planting a tree by an individual is crucial for improving climatic conditions and mitigating the deleterious effects of climate change. As a result, people can reap the benefits of clean and pollution free environment.
In conclusion, although the government and companies have a significant role in introduction of laws and using less detrimental products. People still make a difference in the growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 56
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own opin 56
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...sential. While some people believe that its the job of government and colossal comp...
^^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...nstitute a threat to society. It is the governments duty to enact it by introducing ordinan...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...using water. These techniques can act as a catalyst, helping the public to adapt ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.463878327 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11258478006 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638783269962 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7562115816 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153755569817 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492438287645 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352414178248 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092301691979 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015954119327 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.