The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.
The pie charts provide information about five reasons for getting work by bicycle and car in particular in percentage.
An overview of the pie charts, there are two main reasons both for cycling (health and less pollution) and driving (comfort and distance) to work.
It can be seen from pie charts that 60% of people choose bicycle for health and environment reasons as it causes less pollutions. Moreover, nearly the same percentage pick car because of comfort and distance to work. A quarter of people prefer bicycle due to speed and absence of costs as the same percentage choose car for safety and opportunity not to carry things to work. Finally, less than a fifth of people based on reasons of lacking the parking problems when choose to travel to work by bicycle what is nearly the same as proportion for people who value speed reasons choosing to travel by car.
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car 61
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think it is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discus both these views and give your own opinion 67
- In order to be successful in sport some people think you have to be physically strong Others say that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 67
- Many people around the world are choosing to move to lives in cities What problems do people experience in big cities Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns 73
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bicycle'
Suggestion: to bicycle
...om pie charts that 60% of people choose bicycle for health and environment reasons as i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun pollutions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...th and environment reasons as it causes less pollutions. Moreover, nearly the same p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, so, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 720.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76821192053 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4384713886 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556291390728 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1756747358 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369742362796 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192068527428 0.103423049105 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828804311065 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235584666912 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111769818298 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.