Some people think sending criminals to prison is not an effective way to deal with them. Education and training are better. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
To tackle the criminal problems, we have taken many methods, mostly putting them into prison. Some people have raised the question about the effectiveness of this punishment. They assume that education and training are beneficial. I agree with this view.
The government and authority consider sending the offender to prison, which is an effective method. Incarceration is not a sustainable solution. First of all, this sort of punishment is uneconomical. The cost which runs the securities and facilities system in each prison is higher annually. With the criminal rate increasing year by year, maintaining the money poured into the prison system is impossible for developing and third-world countries. Moreover, the offenders who have harsh sentences or life imprisonment are easily lead to resentful and unpleasantness. The physical disorder will make them tend detrimental to other prison and aggressive behavior, such as suicide or self-harm.
On the other hand, education and training are effective long-term solutions. Firstly, it is a chance for crime to rehabilitate. We could look at statics of recidivism rates to jump to the conclusion that prison has failed to deal with the criminal issues. The offenders have tended to commit crimes again after release from prison because of lack of knowledge to become a white-collar and essential skill to attend the blue color workforce. Since vocational training is essential, policymakers and practitioners should identify programs and strategies to help prisoners successfully reintegrate back into society. For example, we could run several worked-related skills coures that improve more opportunities for offenders to have lucrative jobs instead of a menial ones. Secondly, pedagogic substitution will teach first-time offenders and juvenile delinquents about morality and equip them with the ability to distinguish between right or wrong things. After prison release, they will follow the society standard studied in custody and become law-abiding citizens.
In conclusion, pedagogic substitution is a sustainable solution to deal with criminals. It shall help wrongdoers have the opportunity to make a new life, have a new start. If the government can have a mix-up system to cooperate the prison and education, it will create a better society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-14 | baokhuyen759 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | baokhuyen759 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | baokhuyen759 | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-21 | LUCIALUSO | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | dinhthu05 | 84 | view |
- in many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large family group Is this a positive or negative trend 84
- 11 Government should invest on teaching science subject rather than other subjects for country to develop and prgress To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- some people focus on news in their country while others think it is more important to be aware of international news Discuss both views and give your opinions 61
- people have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world 89
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it positive or negative development 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 529, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
...ntences or life imprisonment are easily lead to resentful and unpleasantness. The ph...
^^^^
Line 3, column 766, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'one'?
Suggestion: one
...have lucrative jobs instead of a menial ones. Secondly, pedagogic substitution will ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, for example, in conclusion, sort of, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57834757835 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09887704441 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603988603989 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.808338399 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9545454545 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.9879759519 376% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226937391313 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630115472015 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522735208303 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141802631295 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559456196091 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.