Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity.
What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?
What solutions can you suggest?
It is a fact that many species of plants and animals in the ecological system have died out due to human activities, which has resulted in the loss of bio-diversity. There is a myriad of culprits of this worrying trend and it is urgent for governments and individuals to take steps to alleviate the problem.
A number of factors have been attributable to this thorny issue. In the first place, profit-oriented human activities have jeopardized the existence of different creatures, both on land or in the sea. For example, the trade of rare animals’ organs or body parts, such as bears’ livers and sharks’ fins has been under severe criticism from the public and animal rights activists; however, this kind of immoral business does continue to grow. Of no less importance is the impact of human production, agrarian practice in particular, on the environment, which in turn destroy living things’ habitats. There have been reports of losses of forestland due to the fast-paced expansion of farmland across the world. This has been prejudicial to the conversation of various species.
Therefore, it is of paramount importance that urgent action must be taken. In fact, a concerted effort should be in place between governments and individuals. The government from across the world should introduce new legislation to criminalize the trading of endangered animals and they must crack down on this kind of business. One possible solution is to combine a prohibitive fine with long prison terms. In addition, each person should also assume responsibility to assist local authorities in the fight against such large-scale problem. Without the act from all citizens, this can never be possible.
In summary, the loss of biodiversity can be driven by a multitude of reasons such as money or agricultural activities. Having said that, this matter can be reversed by the collaboration of authorities and the general public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-06 | levanhoan123 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-21 | minhtran224 | 80 | view |
| 2022-03-06 | Cena | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-21 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | christine112 | 61 | view |
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 80
- Nowadays most people try to balance work and other aspects of their life Unfortunately not many people achieve this balance What problem does this cause Can you suggest some solutions to this issue 61
- The only way to improve the safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences To what extent do you agree with this idea 84
- Teleworking has been on the increase in recent years Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Teleworking has been on the increase in recent years Do youy think this is positive and negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...he collaboration of authorities and the general public.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in fact, in particular, in summary, kind of, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19935691318 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04554061971 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594855305466 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3722544441 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0625 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12703631047 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403132016121 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439382647575 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852547089974 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318380496351 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.