The diagrams show human’s cutting tools 1.4 million years ago and 80,000 years ago. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pictures compares 2 distinct stone tools for cutting purpose in the stone era from 1.4 million years ago and 0.8 million years ago.
Its is noticeable that there are 3 main aspects to distinguish the cutting devices in 2 different points in Stone Age, namely the found date, the shape and size. Additionally, the latter found stone tool is noticeably larger and was more meticulously produced due to the its roundness.
As can be seen from the pictures, the cutting device stone-age humans used 1,4 million years ago doesn’t have an even form of front and back side with the front side being slightly flatter. Many cracks on the surface were observed as well as great deal of sharp points around the edges. In terms of the size, the tool back in that time was more than 5 centimeters.
A more detailed look at the pictures shows that the cutting device back in 0.8 million years ago is more well-formed which has a relatively water drop shape. Regarding the smoothness and roundness, the cutting tools were more finished in the production since less cracks and fragments on booth front and back side An improvement in sharpness can also be observed based on the perspective form the side view despite the thickness being similar to the older tool. Moreover, the latter cutting tools were enlarged in both length and width and were about 10 centimeters in length.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-14 | Lastinfortune | 87 | view |
- The education you receive from your family is more important than the education you receive from schools To what extent do you agree with this statement and why 95
- Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and deal ing with diseases Who do you think should fund these researches private companies individuals or governments 92
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 92
- Deciding the size of our family is a personal preference In your opinion should the government intervene in the rights of individual with regard to family planning 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
...d was more meticulously produced due to the its roundness. As can be seen from the p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('relatively') instead an adjective, or a noun ('water') instead of another adjective.
...years ago is more well-formed which has a relatively water drop shape. Regarding the smoothness an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cracks is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...e more finished in the production since less cracks and fragments on booth front and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82159624413 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5298064453 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591549295775 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5859407082 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.375 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2244437421 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911735545876 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756592785408 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150865193021 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330699224109 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.