The table below shows the information and predictions regarding the change in a percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries.
The rendered tabular chart depicts the percentage of people in terms of age 65 and over in three different countries namely Canada, Germany and the UK in the year 1998, 2000 and 2030.
Overall, it is evident that population of aged people follows an increasing trend. In which Germany accounted for the highest percentage of elderly people and is predicted to be maximum in the future.
To begin with, in 1988, the UK accounted for the minimum percentage of elderly people which was 14.23%, whereas Canada had 16.32% of aged people. While population aged over 65 and above was 20.67% in Canada by 2000, the figure remained nearly same for the UK. In contrast, by 2030, it is estimated that both nations Canada and the UK will experience almost 6 % rise in the population of the elder people at 26.35% and 20.35% respectively.
Moving further, Germany reported a dramatic change in the figures, having the maximum percentage of aged people in the given span of time. Initially, this comprised of approximately a fifth, then the proportion rose to 25.32% in 2000. For the prediction of 2030's population, it is expected that the proportion will account for 30.42%.
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate changes we need to find a way to live with it to what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries to tourist information officer made by telephone letter email and in person from January 2001 to june 2001 49
- The threat of nuclear Weapons maintain world peace but nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy the benefits of nuclear technology for outweigh the disadvantages to what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table below shows the information and predictions regarding the change in a percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 78
- In some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past do you think this is positive or negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The rendered tabular chart depicts the percentage of ...
^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le population aged over 65 and above was 20.67% in Canada by 2000, the figure rem...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93908629442 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66548508411 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558375634518 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.97384615 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200673823031 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839651596258 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539329013369 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127562374153 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290190070767 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.