With the development of online communication, people will never be alone and will always be able to make new friends. To what extent do you agree?
Nowadays, it is undeniable that the advancement of virtual communication has eliminated geographical barriers among individuals and provided endless possibility of establishing friendships. Personally, while there are some positive functions to use internet in connecting people, I maintain that we should not support that idea.
On the one hand, the idea of connection and togetherness through virtual world on the internet is beneficial to some extent. Firstly, the effective use of online means in conversation keeps people from desolation. Distance does not matter, as all they need is a computer or smartphone, they can reduce their homelessness by giving their family a video call through the internet in their free time. Furthermore, this service allows approaching friends from different part of the world regardless of socializing anxiety and geographical distances. For instance, Facebook which is a social network application matches users around the world with common shared interests, supplying them with multiple potential individuals with whom the can interact.
Despites the wonderful advantages, I believe that the outbreak of information technology in communicate leads to lack of interaction in social relationship having negative impacts on their mental health. It is indisputable that a lot of young people are young people are so backsliding in the virtual world that they ignore their goof friendships in reality. So the limitation of face-to-face communication makes users accessible to suffer from psychological diseases. For example, according to a recent study of WHO, those who abuse internet in daily life can create a more negative emotion eventually leading to depression.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the invention of virtual means of communication marked an important milestone in associating people across countries and cultures but the dependence on it are able to bring significant impacts on real relationships. Therefore, it is advisable that users limit the use of the network to avoid the potential risks from it.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- As computers translate quickly and accurately learning foreign languages is a waste of time Do you agree and disagree 61
- With the development of online communication people will never be alone and will always be able to make new friends To what extent do you agree 92
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 61
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: Whom
...example, according to a recent study of WHO, those who abuse internet in daily life...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to avoid the potential risks from it.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60702875399 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22653021032 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603833865815 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5030415821 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0932692819507 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314569583939 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255584952423 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0509673228103 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019409596015 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.