Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?
In modern society, it is an argument that the majority of food purchased from food stores and restaurants are thrown away because of people’s wasting habit. The considerable reason is because of excessive buying of food products. However, I believe food wastage should be reduced significantly by the government.
To begin with, one primary reason behind the problem is that people are influenced by the popular throwaway culture that tends to hesitate to throw out delicious meals. Cuisine’s deliciousness and promotions make people buy more eatables than they need without thinking about the exact quantity. For example, Chinese wastes about 18 million tons of food each year which is enough to feed about 30 to 50 million citizens per year. According to a result of the report by the Chinese Institute of Agricultural Sciences, a large amount of wasted food comes from restaurant services.
In order to tackle this problem, raising community’s awareness of food’s importance by the government policies is desirable. The countries should be responsible for educated residents about effective strategies to avoid wasting food in large quantities as well practical ways to reshape buying habits. Furthermore, the policies should also focus on expanding incentives to food donations. For instance, during the covid-19 pandemic, the US government strengthens liability protections, clarifying guidelines for how to donate leftovers efficiently and to create alternative market channels, such as the Farmers to Families Food Box program.
In conclusion, the long-lasting food-wasting behavior in people has been largely contributed by the throw-away culture that can be minimized by sufficient national control. However, I predict that joining hands of the community and the government will gradually eliminate this problem in the near future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | Hoàng Ngọc Thảo My | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | nle.hngoc | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | minhtuvn23 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | phamminhtu | 61 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future 56
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 89
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 61
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extend do you agree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62142857143 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03055022956 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646428571429 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6761173077 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.076923077 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376885327709 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128708510608 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898680096555 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230585357091 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728595441941 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.