News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?
Recently, the phenomenon of news editing and its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, whereas journalists are striving to be neutral in terms of various news, it is likely that enormous factors exert influence on what to broadcast on TV and newspapers. In my mind, such elements as editors’ psychological mood as well as monarchs and governors’ favor could affect on editors’ decisions.
Obviously, such matters as thoughts, beliefs, and family backgrounds are hard-wired on human’s brain. Consequently, editors’ mind-set paves the way to what news must be broadcasted on TV or have to be printed in newspapers. Psychologically speaking, editors’ mood would lead to influences on their decisions. For instance, if they experience bad moments in their everyday life, they would tent to disseminate unhappy news and vice versa.
In addition, we shouldn’t lose sight of such external factors as governments’ favor or societies’ circumstances on editors’ decision-making process. Miscellaneous nations, around the four corners of the globe, don’t have democratic leaders, or even cruel monarchs govern in such countries. Hence, editors as well as journalists should, or perhaps must, obey monarchs’ orders to do with what types of news must be covered regardless of moral responsibilities and being impartial. Otherwise, severe actions would be taken against them, like to be executed or jail to death.
On the other hand, in today’s frantic societies, there are far more than enough bad news ranging from terroristic attacks, suicides, drought, pandemic diseases, civil wars, and so forth. Ergo, it is far better to report more good news instead of bad ones. This approach provides societies with not only a bit happier atmosphere, but also alleviation of people’s pain should be taken into account.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments about neutrality of journalists and editors, I am inclined to believe that attempts to dissemination of happy news are of higher priorities. Happy populace come up with far more peaceful community and leads tranquility.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 89
- It is important to preserve both the culture and environment of the places you visit but some people think it is impossible to be a responsible tourist To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates of US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 67
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, whereas journa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 396, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... as monarchs and governors’ favor could affect on editors’ decisions. Obviously, such ma...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'order' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
... or perhaps must, obey monarchs’ orders to do with what types of news must be covered...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, well, whereas, for instance, in addition, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53374233129 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21971349777 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650306748466 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0640499692 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339215200389 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096625051476 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835208210162 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166135206179 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058768513583 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.