The bar chart shows the percentage of small , medium, large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016.
The chart compares the proportion of social media used for business purposes in small, medium and large companies from 2012 to 2016.
It is clear that the percentage of business that have social media presence experienced a remarkable growth in small and medium companies, while there was a slight rise in the figures for large companies throughout the period.
To begin with, accounting for less than 80% of overall large business in 2012, big companies had the largest proportion compared to others. It was followed by that of medium and small business. While the former made up more than 30%, the latter was only 5% less during the time. In the next 2 years, the figures for medium and small companies fairly decreased to nearly 50% and less than 35%, respectively. By contrast, the period brought a slight fall in the rate of large companies.
From 2014 to 2016, the proportion of big companies, after a 30% decrease in the first year, dramatically elevate to nearly 80% by 2016. Similarly, falling to 30% in 2015, the level of small and medium business witnessed a significant growth to less than 50% and 52%, respectively in the last period.
- People are surrounded by all kinds of advertising Some people believe that advertising has a negative effect on people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 73
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Others believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 78
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 38
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, similarly, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85279187817 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61977133251 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51269035533 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4762892277 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.222222222 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381653755883 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170474736647 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178445044866 0.0843802449381 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301793005934 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.197034782436 0.0819641961636 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.