Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Is this a negative or positive development?
Advances in robotics have enabled robots to be integrated into households and workplaces, taking over tasks formerly performed by humans. This is a positive development, which will be proved in the following essay.
Discussing the positives of utilizing robots, people first highlight the improvement to work quality. This encompasses eliminating human errors, reducing work hazards as well as elevating production rates. As an example, the current use of drones and robots allows scientists to safely obtain data and samples from dangerous work zones such as volcanoes or precarious mountainous areas. Similarly, productivity in production lines is also heightened thanks to the use of programmed robotic arms or mini transporting units.
Furthermore, robots have also transformed household work. Repetitive errands such as cleaning the house and doing the dishes are viewed as burdens and a source of stress for consuming significant amounts of time. The placement of robots in homes, evident by the widespread popularity of the vacuum cleaning robot Rumba, permits the household chores to be completed without human input and thus, liberating people to have more time for their individual desires.
There are indeed concerns related to the rise of automated machines, which can be resolved with reasonable trade-offs nonetheless. The robotic replacement in jobs such as bartenders, construction workers and receptionists is eminent but gradual. This also catalyzes a beneficial reorientation to the workforce as a whole, causing it to shift its focus to more sophisticated problems such as green energy or aging populations. Likewise, in homes, while there are worries that people will become more sedentary and reliant on machines, it should be noted that the additional free time could be instead invested in leisure pursuits or meaningful pastimes, which could benefit members of the public mentally and physically.
In brief, it is in my conviction that the implementation of robots in our work and home is an advantageous trend, enabling existing tasks to be completed safer, faster while allowing time and resources to be better spent on other purposes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-11 | transcendenceeee | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | caigicungduoc | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-04 | hungdung2507 | 73 | view |
- In some countries more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college University or even after finding a job Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
- In many countries truancy skipping classes is a worrying problem for both parents and educators What are the causes of truancy What may be the effects on the child and the wider community 89
- Many people today are worried about the large quantities of waste produced by ordinary households What problems are caused by household waste What solutions may be possible in both the short and the long term 84
- Some employers are willing to give their workers a certain amount of unpaid leave believing this benefits the individual and the organization Other employers see no merit in this arrangement and discourage it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The use of software makes it unnecessary for people to know how to spell words correctly these days Do you agree with this statement 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, likewise, nonetheless, similarly, so, thus, well, while, in brief, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53153153153 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02500051332 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615615615616 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5832933554 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.571428571 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2986416331 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928211631035 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567828023301 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163599048782 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574430264501 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.