Knowing how to make a group presentation is the most important task for anyone in the world of work today.
How important are presentation and public speaking skills, compared with various other work skills?
Which skill is the most important ability for most people these days?
The modern workplace requires workers to possess a range of skills. Among these, the ability to deliver a group presentation has been argued to be the most vital. While it does serve a particular role, I would argue that it is not as important as multifaceted management, which will be proved in the essay below.
There are indeed compelling reasons why presentation and public speaking abilities are coveted. Fundamentally, the skill ensures information delivery is clear and adequate, which is crucial in business activities. For instance, in meetings, employees are often required to report notable work progress and impediments that need urgent addressing. Knowing how to articulate an idea and compel listeners to pay attention is important for one to make an individual impression, which may lead to further prospects of promotion within the ranks of a company. Likewise, leaders and managers, also utilize their verbal skills for various purposes, including negotiating and delivering speeches. However, the skill is also becoming increasingly replaceable, evident by the use of online reports and personnel outsourcing to prominent speakers outside.
In comparison to the ability to construct a group presentation, the ability to manipulate management techniques to varying effects is far more important and is the most instrumental ability at work. On a individual level, effective management enables employees to work productively and develop intrinsic sources of motivation such as personal growth. This could be exemplified by the fact that workers can make plans for their work, review their expectations and troubleshoot issues to further improve their workflow and overall capabilities. On an interpersonal level, the skill is strategic for coordinating talents and dividing workloads. A team leader, for instance, needs to assign tasks to able team members, spending enough time giving needed support while still balancing their own duties to ensure general work progress.
In brief, albeit of value, presentation and public speaking skills could be substituted and thus, only secondary to a more imperative skillset, which is management on multiple levels.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-15 | vevinawynn | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-23 | Quân Lê 2020 | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-23 | Quân Lê 2020 | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-23 | Quân Lê 2020 | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-16 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
- Intelligence is the most important quality of a leader To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some employers are willing to give their workers a certain amount of unpaid leave believing this benefits the individual and the organization Other employers see no merit in this arrangement and discourage it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Light pollution excessive light during night time is a form of pollution that distresses many people especially in modern cities What are the causes of light pollution and what solutions can you suggest for governments and businesses to take 89
- Some people think that printed books are no longer necessary in this digital era as all writing can be stored electronically Others think that printed books still play important roles Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention in school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e most instrumental ability at work. On a individual level, effective management ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, may, second, so, still, thus, while, for instance, in brief, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62121212121 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07800186817 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624242424242 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0102632963 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372059997789 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985160886507 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052356464646 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190520645295 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559706008973 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.