Technology is intensifying day by day which is helping us in various fields of work in this contemporary era. However, few masses reckon, modern gadgets for example, cell phones, paves the way to decline in social interaction among people. I disagree partially with this statement and will discuss both sides in forthcoming paragraphs.
The first advantage of this notion is that it offers the folks to save time as with the help of modern technologcal gadgets, they can send their messages to another person with the blink of an eye. Another benefit is that it helps one to save money on travelling from one place to another. Video calling feature, for instance, offers the person to interact with his dear ones face to face via screen whereas without cell phones, one will pay approximately rupees hundred for a distance of about fifty kilometers. As a consequence of this, new technological goods are momentous for human beings.
Despite these positive developments, negative impacts of this exist. The first downside of this notion is, text messages on mobile phones could lead to misunderstandings between two people as it does not allow to know the mood of another person. Consequently, these misunderstandings could turn into huge losses, skirmishes or even humongous fights. Furthermore, because of cell phones, traditional values are diminishing especially in youngsters as in reality, they are not social person in which they could follow their culture however, social media sites are influencing them more and emboldening them towards western culture. As a result of this, contemporary gadgets do have a bad side.
It can be concluded that although newly developed things are blessings for human beings, usage of these goods should be limited.
- There was a time when people only shopped out of necessity but these days shopping seems to have become a new form of leisure activity People dont appreciate the value of money anymore To what extent do you agree with this view 56
- The chart below gives the information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2014 and future projections for 2025
- Some people believe the purpose of education should be helping the individual to become useful for society while others believe it should help individuals to achieve their ambitions Discuss both sides and give your opinion 56
- Some believe that more action should be taken to prevent crime while others feel that crime is being tackled effectively now Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 87
- The chart below gives the information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2014 and future projections for 2025
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ones, one will pay approximately rupees hundred for a distance of about fifty kilometer...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'knowing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: knowing
...between two people as it does not allow to know the mood of another person. Consequentl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, whereas, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2332155477 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91922838992 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632508833922 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2530374414 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.923076923 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0879276669209 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0295895964032 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280374265716 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0474195441521 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361442912543 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.