the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
The maps illustrate how the way to the city hospital developed over the course of 3 years from
2007 to 2010.
As can be seen from the maps, the road access to the hospital witnessed significant changes, especially in terms of infrastructures.
It is noting that he city hospital was a rectangle area situated on the Ring Road which can be accessed straightly by the Hospital Road. In 2007, the car park both for staff and public was erected on the right of the Hospital Road, which even had bus stops on both side.
The road was altered considerbly since then to 2010. Two round abouts was constructed in the T-junction and the crossroad on the Hospital Road and one even took a small part of the main figure. Specially, there was a new-built bus station, which had two road access to the roundabouts, on the left side of Hospital Road. Additionally, the car park that once for both staff and public was for staff only in 2010 and the one for public was added on the right area of the hospital. Last but not least, all the bus stops on the roadside was demolished to make way for higher improvement.
- THE DIAGRAM BELOW SHOWS A POSSIBLE FUTURE MEANS OF HOME ENERGY PRODUCTION 11
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
- the plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 78
- the plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 54
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53731343284 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56835947336 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512437810945 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6084680548 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325791507903 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150423039208 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092800559828 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186838965623 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039104020152 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.