Sending criminals to prison is no the best method of dealing with them. Education ans job training are better way to help them. Do you agree or disagree?
There exists a belief that instead of punishing criminals by putting them in prison, education and job training are assessed as the best methods to cut crime. In my personal perspective, I strongly agree with this school of thought for several reasons.
To begin with, prison is not an appropriate environment to help criminals rehabilitate their good manner. It is due to the fact that people who commit different types of crimes are kept in the same place. These criminals have to expose to others’ bad habits leading to be lack of self-acknowledgement about their previous faults. In contrast of this, if offenders are given vocational training and valuable moral lessons, they will be motivated to rehabilitate to become such good citizens after the time of punishment finishes. In other words, criminals receiving job training and education are aware of the meaning of being honest people and thus, it will be helpful to cut crime.
Additionally, maintaining prisons is extremely expensive. National budget will be put under heavy pressure to operate these facilities. However, with the same amount of money, it is obviously more beneficial to construct vocational training center dedicated to criminals. This policy will not only help offenders to get rehabilitation but it also ensures that they can find certain jobs to make ends meet by themselves. In some Nordic countries, for instance, criminals who undergo a vocational training course can apply for multiple manual work like builders or craftsmen. The crime rate in these nations also reduces to a minimum.
In conclusion, I believe that forging and providing chance to rehabilitate are always much better than punishment. Allowing criminals to get education and job training is beneficial to both themselves as well as the development of the whole society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-22 | letcallmemit | 84 | view |
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 84
- The diagram below shows stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparison when relevant 78
- More and more plastic is polluting cities countrywide and oceans in the world What are the problems caused by plastic wastes what measures should be taken to solve it 84
- Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other couries but other people think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the informationcan be seen on TV and the Internet Dicuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 334, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...dgement about their previous faults. In contrast of this, if offenders are given vocatio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...aining is beneficial to both themselves as well as the development of the whole society. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27739726027 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99010652069 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616438356164 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.319359772 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.733333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24344663552 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744392370883 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819167946896 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156538791936 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763710047359 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.