Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994.
The provided picture illustrates the growth of a village named Chorleywood from 1868 to 1994.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the village expanded as transport infrastructure was improved. Also noteworthy is that all four residential areas are situated along main roads, motorway or railway.
Looking at the details, at the beginning of the period, the village covered only a small area next to the western arterial road. Furthermore, Chorleywood Park and Golf course is also positioned near this region. Between 1883 and 1922, the village grew southwards along the main road and in 1909, a railway was constructed crossing the area from west to east. It is interesting to note that Chorleywood station was located in this part of the village.
The expansion of the village continued to the east and west alongside the railway until 1970, when a motorway was built to the east of the area. Accordingly, further development of the village was seen around motorway intersections with the railway and one of the main roads.
- The advancement of internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how people in other places live To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 70
- The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010 Figures are in millions of dollars 84
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other while others think that people have become more independent Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... transport infrastructure was improved. Also noteworthy is that all four residential...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, furthermore, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82624869056 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9142254592 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.5555555556 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228307367178 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916459512084 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859694130765 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150131704168 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103247150104 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.