In this day and age, many individuals advocate the view that people dictate the number of members in their household by themselves as opposed to be interfered by authorities. To the best of my knowledge, regulators should completely respect the autonomy of their citizens; however, some attempts should also be made to ensure the stability of population with a subtle approach and this essay will outline the rationales.
For the most part, planning their own family size is a basic right of every household. Given that each couple have a distinct financial condition and lifestyle, deciding whether to have babies or not or how many kids to have in the future is entirely depend on people autonomy and wish. In particular, a young couple with a hectic schedule cannot hold accountable for raising many children owing to their time and material foundation are not sufficient. Besides, bringing up a human being, parents shoulder an immense responsibility to suffice their daily necessity and attention which the government can neither provide nor compensate. Thus, the size of a family should be totally tailored and designed by the couple themselves.
At the mean time, regulators are responsible for managing the population to uphold the living standard. In specific, among the populous countries, the communal infrastructure and social welfares do not be able to accommodate effectively. In contrast, having an old population is problematic due to the shortage in human resources which may result in insufficient domestic production. Hence, authorities play an essential role in coming up with initiatives to control the number of new borns by introducing some compensations with regards to support big families or encouraging tight-knit households with fewer members by diplomatic approach not by fines or regulations.
It therefore can be concluded that having the right to dictate one’s household size is undeniably advisable; nevertheless, government should also play their part of maintain a stable growth of population and ensuring the living standard for dwellers.
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 92
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favor of the 92
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 95
- Some people fail at school but end up being successful in life Why do you think that is the case What is the most important thing to succeed in life 89
- The diagrams show human s cutting tools 1 4 million years ago and 80 000 years ago Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
... kids to have in the future is entirely depend on people autonomy and wish. In particu...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42356687898 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12803870679 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595541401274 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.8469244126 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.916666667 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170664198551 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628504394172 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661001770578 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980324498938 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406088028837 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.