Parents should encourage children to spend less time studying and more time doing physical activities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Faced with the potential consequences from the heavy school workload, some parents encouraged their children to participate in outdoor activities to reduce children’s pressure. To the best of my knowledge, this point of view is grounded for the following reasons.
Firstly, it is note-worthy that physical activities do a great job in physical and mental well-being. Nowadays, many sociological studies have shown that although it is invisible, the overall awareness of the young towards health by doing outdoor activities is accompanied by enhancing study efficiency. Therefore, it will be a grave mistake to neglect the fact that hanging out in the natural environment helps children improve their health status and physical fitness after their stressful time at school. For instance, if children concentrate only on study and ignore doing physical activities, they will be peer-pressured which might have negative effects on children’s health. This example is the illustration of the fact that young people should follow their parents’ advices and spend more leisure time on doing outdoor activities.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by the objectors to this is that with the stiff competition in contemporary society, young people are afflicted with busy studying schedules every day which leads to have less time for physical activities. This argument could be true to some extent; however, it is incomplete. What they fail to take into account to this is that schools organize many activities for young people to engage in. Therefore, parents should encourage their children to spend more time on these activities which provides them with more opportunities to make new friends and communicate with each other. For example, many schools promote students to join in sport activities at school by awarding plus marks and interesting presents which create many motivations for children.
According to the above analysis, we can conclude that there are many chronic positive effects on health problems and movement activities at school when children spend more their time on outdoor activities rather than studying.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-14 | Lombardi Florentina | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | Namnef | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-21 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-20 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- The tables show the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010 84
- the chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 73
- The charts below show the percentages of male and female students getting top grades A and B in school examinations in 1960 and 2000 84
- Some people argue that holding sporting events is beneficial to countries development However other people hold the opposite opinion Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Music has been and will continue to be the universal language of mankind To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52905198777 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91560345109 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553516819572 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.9919201734 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.076923077 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349923109617 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121838956096 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753697781765 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199263047596 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778964731407 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.