People are living in a ‘throwaway society’, using things for a short time and then throwing them away. What are the causes of this? What problems does it lead to?
Nowadays, individuals are living a throwaway lifestyle, which means throwing them away when they have just used them for a short time. There are a number of reasons behind this phenomenon and several problems have resulted from his tendency.
There are two primary reasons why items have only been used for a short amount of time then being thrown away. Firstly, individuals are now live in a consumer culture so they are persuaded to follow the latest trend. Therefore, products that are not fashionable or less being used in society will eventually be got rid of. Furthermore, advertising manipulates people that buying a product will make them happier. When buyers purchase stuff without thinking properly, they will likely end up casting them away.
Because of these causes, this tendency could have negative consequences in terms of both individuals and the environment. The main issue is that the amount of waste that consumers throw their things away is significantly increasing over time. This may result in the overload of the landfills, which will release bad and toxic smell into the atmosphere, and the way workers handle those trash will also let more carbon dioxide emissions out into the air. Another problem is that purchasing lots of items will have a huge adverse impact on the buyer's budget. Since then, they cannot have an emergency fund, make an investment or even buy what they want later in life.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are various reasons for the 'throwaway society' that are happening these days. With that, several problems to both each person and the community have resulted from this trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-07 | dinhthu05 | 61 | view |
| 2020-11-15 | lhm.ils | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-23 | hanhkatori2402 | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Architecture | 79 | view |
- Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shops and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 58
- The diagram below describes how storm water is recycled in an Australian city 84
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots 78
- In many countries plastic containers have become more popular than ever They are used in many businesses such as the food and drink industry Do you think the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.036900369 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51485693137 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619926199262 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4948975024 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.5 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295480966245 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899764676033 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754410099969 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177958705361 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635946641507 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.