The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided line graph depicts the figure for different types of asking for information that a specific Tourist Information Office received from January to June in 2011.

A glance at the graph reveals that an upward trend is evident in the number of enquiries received in person and by telephone, whereas the amount of questions sent by letter and email exhibited a slight decrease. In the end, asking for information in person was the highest choice.

As presented in the line graph, in January, enquiries received by calls account for the highest number, at over 800 times, followed by letter and email, with just under 800 times. At that time, face-to-face questions was at a low number, only over 400. The number of phone call questions slightly decreased in February, but quickly increased in March. Similarly, the number of enquiries received in person experienced a moderate increase from over 400 to 800 in March. On the other hand, letter and email questions exhibited a fractional drop.

A quite different picture was presented in April. While asking for information in person increase overwhelmingly and peaked at about 1900 enquiries in June, the number of written type of enquiries fall to by over 300. The amount of phone call enquiries remain steady from March to April before a significant rise in May and then became the second highest choice of asking for information.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-26 minhnhat2002 73 view
2023-07-12 Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn 67 view
2023-04-09 vuhungbo 89 view
2023-04-09 vuhungbo 89 view
2023-04-09 vuhungbo 89 view
Essays by user minhpn :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, second, similarly, so, then, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04761904762 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69599323592 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506493506494 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4031911635 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19153710451 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763082794134 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624361023514 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13541294932 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449588861198 0.0819641961636 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.