Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? Why?
It is true that technology development is gaining more achievements for the time being, hence various predictions about sophisticated inventions, especially self-driving cars. Despite some obvious benefits of advances in technology, I consider this invention is wholly consequent.
Undoubtedly, the introduction of computer-controlled equipments indirectly increase the reliance of people on technology. This leads to an obvious consequence, the laziness of human. According to the theory of human beings, if any parts of body are not used for a long time, they cannot function as before, or they even disappear in the future. I doubt that in the long term, this is no longer a theory, but a reality if people keep depending on technology and rising the level of laziness. Therefore, the introduction of self-driving cars may result in significant changes of human development, obviously in a negative way.
Another point to consider is the perfection of this invention. Cars that is driven by computers comprising electronic elements, which makes it sensitive to water. Although the manufacturers can tackle this issue by applying some sophisticated technology advances. However, we cannot assure that the function is absolutely perfect. There are little chances that on rainy days, water affects the calculating of the computers, which results in some unpredictable lethal accidents. In short, it is safer for people to drive cars, rather than computers, and I believe that most people will not choose to risk their lives for a non-emotional yet pricey machine.
In conclusion, some genius scientists have gone too far in expecting computer-controlled vehicles without any counter-effects. This invention may not only inflicks harm on human evolution, but also becomes the main cause of traffic accidents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | llrasthy J | 80 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | minhpn | 67 | view |
| 2020-04-21 | Duy Dr.Diago Tran | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows transport preferences among young people in four countries in a single year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals while others think that it is important to protect some not all of them Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The diagram details the process of making clothes from plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
- Recent research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes after they are released Why is this the case What can be done to solve this problem 67
- International travel has many advantages to both travellers and the country that they visited Do Advantages outweigh the disadvantages 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 607, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...changes of human development, obviously in a negative way. Another point to consider is the pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nts, which makes it sensitive to water. Although the manufacturers can tackle this issue...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, in short, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56678700361 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36748998391 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628158844765 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9299637452 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118923735342 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347185957201 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417542485669 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636511614673 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174171701486 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.