Today students are more interested in politics than the past. Do you agree or disagree?
Time flies leading to the inconsistent modification in awareness as to how students approach learning politics. Statements abound that children love to immerse themselves into the perspective of political issues. In my view, students are no longer interested in politics in the light of myriad distinct subjects appealing to young learners and the non-core influence of politics.
To begin with, there is no doubt that diversity of academic subjects will decline the attractiveness of politics in school. Since children nowadays prefer to learn something that is able to trigger their critical thinking or develop their imagination and creativity; therefore, the sciences and the arts are likely to suit students from this aspect. On the other hand, politics is a kind of abstract subject that only requires learners to memorize, hence, it is incredibly boring to absorb. For example, in my school, most required subjects are studied in a positive way except for politics. According to the student’s explanation, they state that they relish the constant changing in knowledge than the particular formal one.
Another element sparking politics unattractive is its poor application into reality. The development of a country nowadays depends on technology and agriculture; therefore, most students focus on stem subjects in order to land a stable or high-paid job in future. Meanwhile, politics expresses information regarding how the government was formed and operated for thousands of years, which is such a waste of time for further research. In addition, deeply digging into politics is unrealistic because the correlation of politics with other sectors is loose, leading to the limitation in applying to address interrelated problems as well as the fewer chances gained to enlarge learners’ knowledge. As a result, students are not interested in politics like in the past.
In the end, students no longer enjoy learning knowledge relating to the political field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellow students or co workers than from those at a higher level such as teachers or supervisors Use specific reasons and examples to sup 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ool, most required subjects are studied in a positive way except for politics. According to the s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...order to land a stable or high-paid job in future. Meanwhile, politics expresses informat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 598, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...leading to the limitation in applying to address interrelated problems as well as...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, as for, as to, except for, for example, in addition, kind of, no doubt, as a result, as well as, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49508196721 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98381552142 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586885245902 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7570118825 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.714285714 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6428571429 5.45110844103 250% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191178419085 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07474612867 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784006358408 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11976878482 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270951522365 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ool, most required subjects are studied in a positive way except for politics. According to the s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...order to land a stable or high-paid job in future. Meanwhile, politics expresses informat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 598, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...leading to the limitation in applying to address interrelated problems as well as...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, as for, as to, except for, for example, in addition, kind of, no doubt, as a result, as well as, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49508196721 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98381552142 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586885245902 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7570118825 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.714285714 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6428571429 5.45110844103 250% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191178419085 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07474612867 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784006358408 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11976878482 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270951522365 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.